After a string of courtroom defeats, social media titan Meta is bracing for a brand-new trial set for the 18th of this month. Facing a massive coalition of nearly 30 U.S. states, a loss here wouldn’t just mean a jaw-dropping fine—it could fundamentally and permanently alter how the company runs its platforms.
File photo
According to ABC News on the 17th, back in 2023, a slew of states took legal action against Meta, accusing the company of violating multiple federal and state child privacy protection laws. This case is being called the largest of its kind ever filed under the “social media harms to children” category.
On the 18th, the case moves to trial at a federal court in Oakland, California. California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey will be front and center in the courtroom, with 25 more states joining in as the proceedings unfold.
The plaintiffs are demanding a staggering $1.4 trillion in damages if Meta loses—that’s roughly the company’s entire market value. Legal experts, however, are quick to point out that judges have wide discretion, and a fine anywhere near that astronomical figure is practically impossible. Still, the sheer number is enough to make anyone in the C-suite sweat.
But here’s what really has people talking: the plaintiffs want Meta to make sweeping changes to how Instagram and Facebook work for teens. We’re talking about scrapping “likes” and “infinite scroll,” banning multiple accounts, removing beauty filters, and killing off ephemeral features like “disappearing messages.” The BBC notes that these tweaks would completely rewrite the rulebook for social platforms, potentially throwing Meta into its most severe operational crisis yet.
The Associated Press reports that Meta has already lost two major legal battles recently, and a whopping $22.4 billion in legal expenses is a big reason why its second-quarter profits took a hit. In one case out of New Mexico, a judge went so far as to label Meta’s social products a “public nuisance”—on par with factory air pollution—and ordered the company to strip “like” buttons for minors and tightly restrict content feeds. While that ruling only applies in New Mexico for now, analysts predict that if Meta stumbles again in this new trial, it’ll be forced to roll out these kinds of changes nationwide.
The BBC goes as far as suggesting that no matter how this plays out—whether it’s a settlement behind closed doors or an unfavorable jury verdict—the outcome “could forever change how social platforms operate.” Legal experts say these high-stakes cases are drawing intense scrutiny not just from the legal world, but from regulators and lawmakers alike. The ripple effects could even shape political elections and influence future legislation down the road.